|
<p> <aimoo wysiwyg="WYSIWYG">Reply to : dimmesdale <blockquote> <hr noshade="noShade" width="100%" size="1">How is it that the leaders of the mormon church support the interference of the US government in the country of Iraq?Why do they assume that the people in that country want democracy?The mormon church isn't a democracy. It believes in letting others worship how, when, or what they may.If the US government came to the mormon church and said, "We want your church to adopt democratic principles," the church would fight it tooth and nail. That would mean thatmembers would elect their leaders. It would mean that women would have an equal say in the decision making. <hr noshade="noShade" width="100%" size="1"> </blockquote> <p>I don't think anybody particularly thinks the Iraqi people have been yearning for democracy, but it's pretty clear they've been yearning for the ouster of Saddam and his sadistic henchmen. Once having accomplished the urgently necessary ouster, what are we supposed to do -- appoint a king? The trouble with just departing and leaving the newly Saddamless Iraqis to their own devices to set up a government, is that there are religious extremist elements who have a lot of support from outside the country, who will start a new cycle of horrible abuses in order to get and keep control. It's a pretty safe bet the Iraqi people don't want that either, but until they've got some sort of functioning government, they're ill-equipped to fend it off. Democracy is just a palatable default setting; if a significant majority really wants some other form of government (meaning ONE other form of government, not fighting over twenty other forms of government), once they've got democracy, they can vote to switch to the other form. </p> <p>As for the governance of the LDS Church, I don't think it's a reasonable comparison with Iraq. 1) The LDS Church is a voluntary membership organization, and 2) it HAS a functioning government. Some form of democracy is ethically necessary for a nation, as most citizens have no choice as to whether or not to be subject to the government. However, in a voluntary membership organization, such as a church or political party or football team, hierarchical government's power is severely limited by the freedom of dissenting members to simply walk away, and thus doesn't pose anywhere near the dangers that such a form of government poses in a nation. </p> <p>Fly </p> <br><br> <font face="Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" color="000000" style="font-size:12px;"><b>Message edited by: flyonthewall on 07/01/2003 21:16:23[Server Time/GMT -8 Pacific Time] </b></font> <br><br> </font>
|
|